THOSE IMPACTED

Spiritual abuse will impact each person and church differently, depending on individual circumstances, personal histories, level of involvement, along with many other factors.
The descriptions below highlight those involved in a typical exposure, in which a pastor experiences what is often called a moral failure, but which is actually a form of clergy sexual abuse. The victim of direct abuse in such cases experiences a unique betrayal, while often sitting in the seat of the whistle-blower or the accused.
But for all of those involved, while it may take some time to grasp, the impact of a pastor or spiritual leader abusing their position of trust is far reaching. Those impacted often fall within the categories below.
Clergy sexual abuse occurs when a member of the clergy uses their position of trust to engage in an inappropriate relationship with someone they've been entrusted to shepherd or lead.

While all such abuse is harmful, this is most grievous when it involves children and must ALWAYS be reported to legal authorities, regardless of proof of allegations.
of clergy sexual abuse
Whether the perpetrator is the senior pastor or someone else with spiritual authority, this person is in need of truth, counseling, discipline, and care. They have caused deep harm which is difficult to own. While not the primary focus of care and compassion, this person is walking through trauma. Caring for them is best handled outside the church by wise leaders who reject quick apologies, efforts to control the narrative, cheap grace, and any justification for sin.​
Pastors also walk through this territory, at times, navigating the harm of spiritual and clergy sexual abuse that has happened on their watch. This is devastating and should raise questions among the leadership body about how such abuse was enabled within the church and leadership culture. Abuses of power do not happen within a vaccuum—and often whole leadership overhauls are required to re-set a culture. Without deep repentance on every level of leadership, such sin will not be rooted out and will continue to cause infection within the church body.
A truth-filled apology will contain a majestic quality. A concession, on the other hand, will lack that freeing quality. It does more to confuse than heal because it doesn’t name specific wrongs, so you are left feeling unsure of what the wrongdoer is taking responsibility for. A concession is frustrating because it makes you wonder if they really “get it.” And it traps you because refusing to accept the “apology” will likely lead to further tension.
- Wade Mullen
Something's Not Right: Decoding the Hidden Tactics of Abuse NIV